三峡水库运行前后鄱阳湖洪、枯调控能力变化及其影响因素
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.长江科学院;2.长江勘测规划设计研究有限责任公司;3.武汉大学 水资源工程与调度全国重点实验室

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(U2240224,52409080,42376166); 中央级公益性院所基金项目(CKSF2024326/HL)


Variations of the flood and low flow regulation capacity of Lake Poyang in the pre- and post- Three Gorges Reservoir period: evolution and driving factors
Author:
Affiliation:

Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute

Fund Project:

the Nationa Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant U2240224,52409080,42376166); the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Public Welfare Research Institutes (Grant CKSF2024326/HL)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    鄱阳湖与长江之间通过水体交换,共同形成了江湖之间复杂的洪枯调控与蓄泄关系,在长江中下游水旱灾害防御体系中占据重要地位。本文基于长江-鄱阳湖系统长序列水文数据以及遥感影像解译结果,结合三峡水库的调度周期,分阶段阐明了三峡水库运行前后鄱阳湖对长江干流及五河来水的调蓄过程,揭示了鄱阳湖洪枯调控能力变化特征及其影响因素,主要结论如下:(1)无论三峡水库运行前后,枯水期(12月至次年4月)和集中消落期(5月至6月上旬)鄱阳湖出湖水量普遍小于入湖水量,日调蓄量大于0,湖区存蓄水量增加;汛期(6月中旬至9月上旬)及汛后蓄水期(9月中旬至11月)规律与之相反,全年出入湖水量基本平衡。此外,鄱阳湖日调蓄量与长江干流流量及入湖水量呈显著正相关;(2)三峡水库运行后,鄱阳湖日调蓄量分布发生变化,表现为集中消落期日调蓄量正值增加、汛期日调蓄量正负值转换时间提前,以及汛末日调蓄量负值绝对值增加。受调蓄量变化影响,长江汛前(6月中旬)鄱阳湖的存蓄水量增长约14.15亿m3,而汛末(9月上旬)鄱阳湖的存蓄水量减少约85.52亿m3。鄱阳湖自身泄流能力增强、长江及鄱阳湖五河集中消落期流量增加以及汛后蓄水期退水速率增快是导致日调蓄量变化的主要原因;(3)受长江和鄱阳湖的水文过程与蓄泄能力变化共同影响,三峡水库运行后汛末及汛后蓄水期鄱阳湖自身蓄水功能减弱,“拉空”与“丰枯急转”现象突出,导致湖区退水加快,枯水历时延长,极枯水位频发。另一方面,偏枯的存蓄水量导致集中消落期鄱阳湖的剩余湖容增加,鄱阳湖对五河洪水的调蓄能力增强。相比之下,长江汛前鄱阳湖的剩余湖容较水库运行前同期减少,鄱阳湖对长江洪水的调蓄能力下降,其应对长江极端洪水的能力依然不足;鄱阳湖在汛末及汛后蓄水期对长江补水能力减弱,在枯水期其能力则基本保持稳定。研究成果可深化对鄱阳湖洪枯调控机制的认识,能为江湖系统治理提供科学支撑。

    Abstract:

    Through complex dynamic water exchanges, Poyang Lake and the Yangtze River constitute the Yangtze–Poyang Lake Flood and Low Flow Regulation System, which plays a crucial role in flood and drought prevention in the middle and lower Yangtze region. Utilizing long-term hydrological data and remote sensing interpretations, we clarified the water regulation and storage processes of Poyang Lake in response to inflows from the Yangtze River mainstream and the Five Rivers. By incorporating the operational phases of the Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR), we identified changes in the lake’s flood and low-flow regulation capacity, along with the influencing factors, before and after the TGR’s operation. The main findings are:(1) During the dry season (December to April of the following year) and discharge season (May to early June), the daily regulation volume of Poyang Lake is mostly positive, increasing stored water; during the flood season (mid-June to early September) and impoundment season (mid-September to November), the opposite occurs, while annual total water inflow and outflow remain largely balanced. The daily regulation volume is significantly positively correlated with Yangtze mainstream flow and incoming water from the Five Rivers; (2) After the Three Gorges Reservoir operation, the daily regulation volume changed: positive values increased in the discharge season, the shift from positive to negative occurred earlier in the flood season, and negative values intensified late in the flood season. Consequently, the lake’s water storage decreased by approximately 1.41 billion m3 during the pre-flood season (mid-June) and by roughly 8.55 billion m3 at the end of the flood season (late June), respectively. These changes resulted from Poyang Lake’s enhanced discharge capacity, increased mainstream and tributary flow during the discharge season, and faster recession during the impoundment season; (3) Affected by hydrological processes and storage-discharge adjustments, Poyang Lake’s water storage function weakened in the late flood and discharge seasons. Notable “drawdown” and “rapid flood-drought transition” phenomena led to frequent extreme low water levels and prolonged droughts. Conversely, lower water storage increased Poyang Lake’s available capacity during discharge season, enhancing its regulation of floods from the Five Rivers. By contrast, the Poyang Lake’s smaller pre-flood storage capacity weakened its regulatory effects on Yangtze River floods, making it inadequate for extreme events. Additionally, the lake’s capacity to supplement the Yangtze’s flow declined at the end of the flood season and impoundment season, but remained stable during the dry season. These findings enhance our understanding of Poyang Lake’s regulatory mechanisms and support effective management of the river-lake system.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-12
  • 最后修改日期:2025-10-30
  • 录用日期:2025-10-31
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-02-04
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
您是第    位访问者
地址:南京市江宁区麒麟街道创展路299号    邮政编码:211135
电话:025-86882041;86882040     传真:025-57714759     Email:jlakes@niglas.ac.cn
Copyright:中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所《湖泊科学》 版权所有:All Rights Reserved
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司

苏公网安备 32010202010073号

     苏ICP备09024011号-2