陕北能源化工基地典型河流沉积物重金属时空分布及优控因子
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.石河子大学水利建筑工程学院;2.榆林学院;3.中国环境科学研究院环境基准与风险评估国家重点实验室

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Spatial-Temporal Distribution and Priority Control Factors Analysis of Heavy Metals in Typical River Sediments of Northern Shaanxi Energy and Chemical Industry Base
Author:
Affiliation:

1.College of Water Conservancy Architectural Engineering,Shihezi University;2.State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment,Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为明晰不同污染源对生态环境和人类健康风险的影响,以陕北能源化工基地典型河流窟野河为研究对象,在丰水期和枯水期分别采集59个沉积物样品,测定重金属Cu、Zn、Pb、Cd、Ni、Cr、Hg和As的浓度,采用地累积指数(Igeo)和内梅罗指数(P)评估了重金属污染程度,利用正定矩阵因子分解模型(PMF)解析重金属污染来源,并结合PMF与潜在生态风险模型(RI)和人类健康风险评估模型(HRA),建立PMF-RI/HRA风险源耦合模型,定量解析各污染来源对潜在生态和人类健康风险的贡献。结果表明:沉积物中Hg的平均浓度由丰水期的0.10 mg·kg?1降低至枯水期的0.01 mg·kg?1,而其余7种重金属枯水期浓度明显高于丰水期。8种重金属均处于无污染或低污染等级,但总体污染水平较高。基于受体浓度的PMF结果表明,丰水期重金属污染来源主要来自工业源(48.23%)、交通源(31.06%)、农业源(11.84%)和煤炭开采源(8.87%);枯水期重金属主要受工业源(58.83%)、煤炭开采源(28.12%)和交通源(13.05%)的影响。基于污染来源的PMF-RI/HRA耦合模型结果显示,丰水期和枯水期的综合生态风险指数平均值分别为160.27和147.00,处于中等和低风险水平,主要由煤炭开采源(48.27%)的Hg排放(98.46%)(丰水期)和工业源(46.87%)的Cd排放(69.52%)(枯水期)驱动;致癌风险在所有人群中都很明显,其中男童的风险最高,主要归因于工业源(≥51.47%)的Ni暴露(≥80.13%)。基于污染源导向的环境风险评估结果可为该类地区开展污染防治提供科学依据。

    Abstract:

    To clarify the impact of different pollution sources on the ecological environment and human health risks, the typical river in the northern Shaanxi Energy and Chemical Industry Base was taken as the research object. The contents of heavy metals (Cu, Zn, Pb, Cd, Ni, Cr, Hg and As) in 59 sediment samples were collected and measured during the wet and dry seasons. The Geo-accumulation Index (Igeo) and Nemerow Index (P) were used to assess the heavy metal pollution level; the Positive Matrix Factorization model (PMF) was applied to quantitatively identify the sources of heavy metals. Furthermore, the contribution of each pollution sources to potential ecological risks and human health risks was quantitatively analyzed by combining PMF with the potential ecological risk model (RI) and the human health risk assessment model (HRA). The results showed that the average concentration of Hg in the sediment decreased from 0.10 mg·kg?1 in the wet season to 0.01 mg·kg?1 in the dry season, while the concentrations of the other seven heavy metals in the dry season were significantly higher than those in the wet season. The average content of eight heavy metals was at the non-pollution or low-pollution level, while the overall pollution level was relatively high. The PMF results based on receptor concentration indicated that heavy metal pollution during the wet season mainly came from industrial sources (48.23%), transportation sources (31.06%), agricultural sources (11.84%), and coal mining sources (8.87%); During the dry season, heavy metals are mainly affected by industrial sources (58.83%), coal mining sources (28.12%), and transportation sources (13.05%). Results from the PMF-RI/HRA coupling model based on pollution sources showed that the average comprehensive ecological risk indices (RI) in the wet season and dry season were 160.27 and 147.00, respectively, corresponding to "moderate risk" and "low risk" levels. The wet-season risk was mainly driven by Hg emissions (98.46%) from coal mining sources (48.27%), while the dry-season risk was mainly driven by Cd emissions (69.52%) from industrial sources (46.87%). Carcinogenic risks were evident in all populations, with boys facing the highest risk, which was mainly attributed to Ni exposure (≥80.13%) from industrial source pollution (≥51.47%). The results of the pollution source-oriented ecological and health risk assessment provide a scientific basis for pollution prevention and control in such areas.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-19
  • 最后修改日期:2026-02-01
  • 录用日期:2026-02-02
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-04-28
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
您是第    位访问者
地址:南京市江宁区麒麟街道创展路299号    邮政编码:211135
电话:025-86882041;86882040     传真:025-57714759     Email:jlakes@niglas.ac.cn
Copyright:中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所《湖泊科学》 版权所有:All Rights Reserved
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司

苏公网安备 32010202010073号

     苏ICP备09024011号-2